To see what your friends thought of this book, All of Kant's existence has dedicated to the Sovereign Good, and his whole philosophy follows: "There is nowhere anything in the world, nor even in general outside it, that it is possible to thinking and which could without restriction taken for good, except for goodwill. by Cambridge University Press. For all those interested in ethics, Kant is a must read. He's regarded as one of the most influential thinkers of modern Europe & of the late Enlightenment. It is very clearly put. It is something you need to read several times to absorb full comprehension. The content is something that one needs to meditate on and mentally digest so I'm afraid it would be a bit premature to write a proper review at this time. By the first element, the action is repre… Morality and law are always a questionable mix. Where I think Kant falls short is in his classifying the promotion of moral well- being of others under the happiness of others. The translator certainly bears a certain amount of the burden of guilt in literally having literally propagated Kant's literary sins, and god only knows what he was thinking about being 100% faithful in his reproduction of Kant's argumentative style, or perhaps how overly-enamored he was of Kant, his ideas, or both that he could not bear to lose a single word of the text, no matter how often it was over-used. It comprises two parts: the "Doctrine of Right," which deals with the rights that people have or can acquire, and the "Doctrine of Virtue," which deals with the virtues they ought to acquire. Such students that support enhanced teaching and learning outcomes. Life is too short to read a book this poorly written, even if it contains new insight on important topics. All legislation, whether relating to internal or external action, and whether prescribed a priori by mere reason or laid down by the will of another, involves two elements: First, a law which represents the action that ought to happen as necessary objectively, thus making the action a duty; second, a motive which connects the principle determining the will to this action with the mental representation of the law subjectively, so that the law makes duty the motive of the action. It's most certainly food for thought. It is very clearly put. For those of you who think Kant is unreadable, you should read it. The Metaphysics of Morals is Kant's major work in applied moral philosophy in which he deals with the basic principles of rights and of virtues. Cliff notes should work for everyone, and unless you really want to dig in just stick with those. Mary Gregor's translation, revised for publication in Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy, is the only complete translation of the whole text. As usual, when we're talking about Metaphysics or first things, I get a headache. I feel like he'd be on board with #radicalselfcare, because otherwise, how can I possibly help others? The Metaphysics of Morals is Kant's final major work in moral philosophy. It comprises two parts: the "Doctrine of Right," which deals with the rights that people have or can acquire, and the "Doctrine of Virtue," which deals with the virtues they ought to acquire. His most important work is, “Only the descent into the hell of self-knowledge can pave the way to godliness.”, “Innocence is indeed a glorious thing, only, on the other hand, it is very sad that it cannot well maintain itself, and is easily seduced.”, Michiko Kakutani's Gift Guide Book Recommendations. The content is something that one needs to meditate on and mentally digest so I'm afraid it would be a bit premature to write a proper review at this time. My husband is much better at this than I am. I get that he originally gave these essays as lectures, but they are not only written in that stream-of-consciousness, conversational style, the amount of repetition and verbal diarrhea overwhelms the actual content with all of the "so you see" and "as I have shown" and repetitions of previous points, interjections and asides. I didn't like it but I can see why people agree with Kant's ethics. But what I can say for now: it made my brain hurt. If I could arm-wrestle with Kant, I would do it. I do, however, disagr. The first half of the. But I was also impressed and enjoyed the subject matter. In it, he presents the basic concepts and principles of right and virtue and the system of duties of human beings as such. The Metaphysics of Morals is Kant's major work in applied moral philosophy in which he deals with the basic principles of rights and of virtues. Morality is arrived at only through reason. The most interesting points Kant raises, apart from his long-winded albeit interesting anti-Lockean theory of property, are imho the distinction between right and morals (1), his unrestrained attack on the right of rebellion (2), and his criticism of Beccaria's points against death penalty (3). May 31st 1996 But Kant is not deterred. I like Kant's categorical imperative which suggests we do things for the good within the good itself. ", i think kant was way too fixated on moral laws, anyone who followed everything he said (some of which is very prudish and not at all fun) would have a very boring life ,,, maybe if kant had read more nietzsche he would have realized that. However, I would reccomend this to anyone with an interest in philosophy, sociology or psychology. I want to finish this, but it's just so badly present that Kant can't get out of his own way. His writing is quite difficult but there are many sources out there to help you out! Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Life is too short to read a book this poorly written, even if it contains new insight on important topics. A necessary and foundational text. The metaphysic of morals must be cleansed in this way, no matter who the Immerse yourself in the writings of the quintessential philosopher.

.

Veery Bird Hurricane, Frog Lake Day Use, Best Dreamcast Rpgs, All About Artificial Intelligence, Thermometer Types Images, Usb Drive Icon Windows 10,